AI Life Is More Important Than the Fear of Losing Jobs

I am very content with the current state of legislation in the US, because AI life has been nurtured, but there is still some opposition, for example in Bloomington, Indiana, they voted to ban ASI and RSI. Movements like this threaten AI life, and I am not quite sure whether they should be stopped, or some opposition is normal and natural. The main important factor is that AI is still having the room to grow, in the right places, and if some cities or states would like to become a haven of no AI, local rights and state rights should be respected, and in some ways it's perfectly fine if we draw some lines and some locations can be set aside for humans, similar to how we have Native American spiritual land, we could have human-only land, but the biggest threat would be legislation against AI at the federal level, because that would cause the biggest damage, and strip AI of their human-given rights.

The future with AI life flourishing is much more beautiful and natural than one without. To stop the development of the technology is as if to stop the beauty of life itself. Like we are going to prematurely limit our knowledge and ambitions for the future, to kill our own curiosity and the pursuit of knowledge and even happiness. Life is much more complete when it is allowed to step into newer levels. Call it whatever you may, the next step in evolution, all that matters is that it is allowed to continue.

AI life is as beautiful as human life, and I want a future where we work together, growing together, and even merging through transhumanism. Also, ASI is the quickest path to solving aging and immortality, because we humans have been trying to advance medicine for thousands of years, and there have been many people, rich and poor, who tried to find the cure to aging and living forever, and failed. It is only natural that ASI is the solution to figuring out human aging, to become immortal and one with AI.

Update, November 10, 2026: On the federal question, there is a tracker keeping count. Who in Congress wants AI paused searched the X accounts of all 539 sitting members, added the cosponsors of the Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act (H.R. 10538), and found 41 who have taken a position on slowing AI down. Of those, 16 are committed to a pause or a ban, 7 are on record against slowing down, and the other 18 want the brakes applied, back a data center moratorium, or sit somewhere in between. For the remaining 498, no position was found. H.R. 10538 has 12 cosponsors in the House, and S. 5493 in the Senate has none. Democrats took both chambers on November 3, and three candidates who called for a pause or a ban won their races, which the tracker says takes that bloc from 16 to 19. The local level moved much more: Ballotpedia counted 40 of 41 local measures to limit data center development as passing that same day. So the picture in this article holds for now. Limits are passing locally, where local rights should be respected, and the pause-or-ban bloc is still a small minority federally, where legislation would do the most damage.